JobOwl and Jobscan get compared a lot, but they're not really solving the same problem. JobOwl is a resume writer โ it rewrites your bullet points and generates a cover letter tailored to a job description. Jobscan is a diagnostic tool โ it scores an existing resume against a job description and tells you what's missing, including testing against specific named ATS platforms like Workday and Greenhouse.
If you need help writing
If your problem is the writing itself โ turning your experience into resume bullets that use the right language for a specific role โ JobOwl's rewriting and cover-letter generation is the more direct fit. Its free tier (3 tailored resumes) is enough to see whether the rewritten output actually reads better than what you started with.
If you already have a resume and want to check it
If you've already written (or paid someone to write) a resume and just want to know whether it'll parse correctly for a specific application, Jobscan's diagnostic scan โ including its ATS-specific testing โ is the more direct fit. Its free tier gives 5 scans a month, which covers checking a handful of real applications without paying.
Using both together
The two aren't mutually exclusive. A reasonable workflow: draft or tailor the resume with a writing tool like JobOwl, then run the result through Jobscan's free scan to confirm it actually parses well for that specific employer's ATS before you submit it.
Pros
- JobOwl: faster if your bottleneck is writing, not diagnosing
- Jobscan: more useful if you already trust your writing and want a second opinion on parseability
Cons
- JobOwl doesn't diagnose an existing resume the way Jobscan does
- Jobscan doesn't rewrite anything for you โ it only tells you what's wrong